Entries tagged with “fraud”.
Did you find what you wanted?
Jan 17 2012
Over the past year, the payments industry has been abuzz with news of Visa’s plan to encourage adoption of EMV technology. While many in the payments industry have a clear understanding of what EMV is and how it might impact our business, for small merchants the term just adds on to the growing list of acronyms with which they must now be familiar. PCI DSS, PA DSS, QSA, SAQ, and now EMV. But what is EMV and what do small merchants need to know about it?
EMV itself is a standard begun by Europay, MasterCard International and Visa International. (Its current members are American Express, MasterCard, Visa, and JCB.) The three companies joined together to form EMVco, whose purpose is “to manage, maintain and enhance the EMV™ Integrated Circuit Card Specifications for Payment Systems.” In other words, the company was formed to promote the use of “smart cards.” A “smart card” is essentially a payment card with an embedded micro-processor, or chip. Because the chip can hold much more information than a magnetic stripe can, EMV enabled cards support multiple methods of authentication. This ostensibly makes the process more secure for both the merchant and the consumer. Since the chip can support dynamic and static authentication as well as online and offline authentication, the theory is that using EMV means that the risk of compromised card data being used fraudulently is significantly lower than with magnetic stripe data. In other words, even if the data is compromised, it is less likely that it can be used to perpetrate fraudulent transactions. As a result of its capabilities with respect to fraud prevention, Visa is strongly encouraging the US payments industry to move towards EMV. So, what does this transition mean for merchants?
1) The requirement to comply with PCI DSS will remain - Visa’s program states that if a merchant can verify that at least 75% of its transactions are EMV, then the requirement to validate compliance with the PCI DSS can be waived. It should be noted, though, that it is only the requirement to validate compliance that is being waived, not the obligation to comply itself. Another important caveat to this validation waiver is that only Visa has so far extended this offer. Merchants will still have to validate compliance as required with the other card brands.
2) EMV does not replace data security – The use of EMV cards does not inherently provide protections against the unauthorized access or disclosure of the data itself. Data thieves would still be able to compromise the data. However, the utility of the data is significantly lessened as a result of the layering of authentication mechanisms employed by EMV cards.
3) Acquirers/ Processors have to transition by 2013 – As of April 1, 2013 acquirers and processors must be able to support EMV transactions.
4) Liability Shift means Acquirers likely to encourage adoption – Visa has announced plans to implement an liability shift for fraudulent purchases. Currently, if a counterfiet purchase is made, it is largely left to the issuing bank (the bank that issued the card) to absorb. Under the new rules, which would take effect on October1, 2015 counterfeit purchases that occur at a merchant location that has not adopted the EMV technology may become the liability of the acquiring bank.
As the deadlines come closer, the card brands will release more detail that will help guide merchants on the path to EMV. Moving to EMV will be a challenge for an industry as fragmented as the US card processing ecosystem. Although there will be the inevitable growing pains, though, the technology will serve to benefit all of the stakeholders – from merchant to the consumer.
Dr. Heather Mark, PhD; Sr. Vice President, Market Strategy
Jan 5 2012
Many people today that consider themselves to be internet savvy might believe that they are too clever to fall for an online scam. They know that they should not respond to pleas for help from Nigerian princes that need to move furniture for their long-deceased, well-meaning philanthropist great uncle. They know that any job posting that requires respondents to send their bank routing information is likely not legitimate. They know that a bank will never send an email asking their account holders to “verify their passwords” by clicking on a link. But do they know that they shouldn’t click on that link that promises a sneak peak of the iPhone 5?
According to a recent survey by the Ponemon Institute (in collaboration with PC Tools), the answer is “no.” The temptation is just too much, even for seemingly savvy internet users. “Almost half (47%) of US respondents identified an online survey with a prize as either a scam or an attempt to get you to buy something later. However, when presented with the test scenarios, more than half (55%) of US respondents indicated they would be likely to provide their personal information to redeem a prize after completing an online survey,” said Richard Clooke, Online Security Expert, PC Tools.
A recent article on CNet emphasizes point made by the survey. Last spring, a number of Facebook users were scammed by a link that offered a look at the new iPhone 5. According to Elinor Mills, the author of the article, “People who normally ignore all the other scams involving purported free software or naked celebrity photos clicked that fake news link and even completed a captcha on a second site, which reposted the scam to their own Facebook stream. That probably says more about how fanatical people are about Apple products than anything else. But it did raise the question–what does it take to lure someone to click on something that seems fishy?” It would certainly appear that the old cliche “everyone has their price” is analogous to this situation. If scammers can target the right prey with the right bait, people seem to disregard their concerns about fraud. Target techies and Jobs-o-philes with a promised look at a future Apple product and they’ll likely click away.
The moral of the story – “think before you click.” Many people associate internet scams with malware and Trojans, but sometimes scammers are looking for more specific information about users so that they can launch more targeted and sophisticated attacks later on. For example, in the scam listed above, scammers could perhaps garner email addresses. Those addresses could then be used in phishing attacks later on to get more sensitive data from individuals. It’s important to remember not to let your guard down when it comes to cyberscams.
Dr. Heather Mark, Ph.D.
SVP of Market Strategy
Dec 5 2011
I saw a blog post yesterday that reminded me of complexity and confusion surrounding the relationship between PCI DSS compliance and fraud prevention. The details of the story are less important than the central idea that the author was communicating – the notion that merchants should rely on PCI DSS compliance for the prevention of fraud. The idea behind PCI DSS is of course to reduce the amount of fraud by helping to protect payment data from unauthorized disclosure and use, but it should be noted that the standard is not a fraud prevention program. It is a data security compliance program. Understanding the difference between fraud prevention and data security will help to clarify the relationship between the PCI DSS and fraud.
Fraud is the intentional deception for personal gain. This is a broad definition that includes social engineering as well as the misuse of financial data. Fraud prevention, then, must be a very broad set of practices and procedures that are put in place to prohibit people from being able to misuse (in this case) payment card data. All of the major card brands have suggestions and best practices for preventing fraud at the merchant level. MasterCard Worldwide provides a quick reference guide to help merchants educate their staff on fraud prevention techniques. Among the suggestions is the notion that staff should be familiar with what a card is supposed to look like. Valid cards have a number of fraud prevention mechanisms, including embossed numbers and holograms. (Each of the card brands can also provide a sort of “anatomy of a card” that will keep merchants and their employees current with new card designs and security mechanisms.
Data security is a subset of fraud prevention tools. Ensuring that the data is adequately protected from unauthorized disclosure (data compromise) helps mitigate the risk of fraudulent transactions. All of the major card brands require compliance with the PCI DSS with any entity that stores, processes, or transmits cardholder data. This helps to prevent data thieves from perpetrating fraudulent transactions on a large scale. Merchants should not rely on the PCI DSS to protect them from fraud schemes. PCI DSS is designed to help companies protect payment data from thieves, not to protect merchants from fraud schemes.
Dr. Heather Mark, PhD. ; SVP, Market Strategy
Nov 8 2011
It’s that time of year again. International Fraud Awareness Week, sponsored by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). The intent is to raise awareness of fraud in general, as well as trends and emerging schemes. Payment card fraud alone is estimated to cost the United States $8.6 billion per year. And that is a 2010 number. Estimates for 2011 are likely to grow. Fraud is an interesting animal. It’s said that the only crime that costs the US economy more money is tax evasion. While that’s probably open for debate, what is still surprising is the low level of awareness that many small business owners have regarding fraud and fraudulent schemes. The objective of International Fraud Awareness Week is to educate all organziations, whether small entrepreneurial endeavors to large enterprises, about fraud and how it can be prevented.
Some fraud prevention resources can be found here, including somethings that many organizations may not have considered, such as a fraud policy. The ACFE publishes an annual Report to the Nations on fraud. In 2010, some of the highlights (or lowlights depending on your perspective) included the following:
- “Survey participants estimated that the typical organization loses 5% of its annual revenue to fraud.” To put that into a global perspective, the ACFE estimates that to cost the world economy almost $2.9 trillion annually.
- “Small organizations are disproportionately victimized by occupational fraud. These organizations are typically lacking in anti-fraud controls compared to their larger counterparts, which makes them particularly vulnerable to fraud.” This statement is critically important, because many small companies think that they are “flying under the radar” when in fact, they are easy prey to professional fraudsters.
-
- “Anti-fraud controls appear to help reduce the cost and duration of occupational fraud schemes.” The implementation of fraud awareness training can be an important preventative factor in reducing losses associated with fraud.
Unfortunately, fraud is a fact of life for most businesses. As technology has evolved, so have the manners and methods by which criminals can perpetrate fraud. Awareness is one of the most critical prevention tools and that awareness must be an organizational thing. Having one person or one department responsible for the prevention of fraud is a good step, but education and awareness of the entire workforce will be critical in helping to mitigate the damage.
Dr. Heather Mark, PhD; SVP Market Strategy
Oct 13 2011
Another year has flown by and the busy season at ProPay is about to begin. We want our merchants to have a successful and stress free holiday season. This is the perfect time to make sure our merchants are up to date on the latest fraud schemes. A fraudulent buyer, chargeback or theft of data can put a damper on your end of year sales. Here are just a few of the most prevalent fraud trends today.
Spam— Unsolicited email, possibly fraudulent from a company that you didn’t authorize to send you messages.
Phishing/Spoofing— Phishers will impersonate a legitimate company by sending fake emails or creating fake Web sites in order to acquire your personal information—like PINs, credit card or bank account numbers.
Spyware— Software that records your personal information without you realizing it. Several anti-spyware software programs are available to combat spyware.
E Commerce Fraud- Before you buy anything online, ask yourself if the site is legitimate. Look seal from trusted companies that have certified the site as safe and secure. If the deal sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
Get-out-of-debt fraud— Many online debt elimination resources are fraudulent. Be wary. Investigate them thoroughly. If they aren’t a legitimate 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, then it’s likely that they’re trying to take advantage of your debt-related vulnerability.
International schemes— Don’t respond to emails that suggest you have won or inherited money from someone in a foreign country—Nigeria and Eastern European countries are where many of these emails originate. And any scheme that asks you to give advance money for a larger sum in return is too good to be true, and will always be fraudulent.
Evil twin— A fake Wi-Fi network set up near to and often using a similar name as a real public Wi-Fi network, like those in libraries, parks, and coffee shops. If you unknowingly join the evil twin network, the criminal behind it will have access to all of the information on your computer.
Take a few moments to review this list and to research other fraud trends that could impact you and your business. The small investment of time will be worth it in the long run. Here’s to a successful holiday season and a strong push to the finish line in 2011.